Ellison leads coalition suing Trump Administration over federal funding conditions
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
25% ReliableLimited
- Policy Leaning
-28% Somewhat Left
- Politician Portrayal
-6% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-2% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
60% : Subsequently, DHS amended funding terms requiring recipients' cooperation in these efforts.58% : DOT Secretary Duffy also communicated intentions to require state assistance in immigration enforcement as a condition for receiving transportation funds.
57% : The lawsuits challenge conditions imposed on federal funding that allegedly coerce states into enforcing immigration laws.
52% : State agencies have noticed similar language regarding immigration enforcement being added to grant terms by various federal administrations related to railroads, highways, and transit systems.
38% : Both agencies are accused of imposing new requirements that would compel state agencies to engage in immigration enforcement, traditionally a federal responsibility.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
