Elon Musk's former DOGE aide 'Big Balls' attacked in Washington: Who is Edward Coristine and what happened
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
50% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
38% Somewhat Right
- Politician Portrayal
-55% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-33% Negative
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
38% : Edward Coristine, alias 'Big Balls', a former high-profile member of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), was violently attacked during an attempted carjacking in the early hours of Sunday in Washington's Logan Circle neighborhood.36% : In response to the attack, President Trump took to social media and the White House podium on Tuesday to renew calls for the federal government to assume direct control of Washington, D.C. "If D.C. doesn't get its act together, and quickly, we will have no choice but to take Federal control of the City, and run this City how it should be run," Trump said on Truth Social.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
