
Evidence shows Trump WAS hit by a bullet
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
66% Medium Right
- Politician Portrayal
-45% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-23% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
75% : Analysis by forensic audio expert Steve Beck showed Trump grabbed his ear immediately after the 'crack' of the first bullet was picked up as it passed his microphone.58% : Meanwhile, Trump on Friday appeared without a bandage on his ear for the first time since the shooting as he hosted Benjamin Netanyahu at Mar-a-Lago.
56% : Wray confirmed the FBI had recovered three 'explosive devices' in possession of Crooks There was an initial volley of three rounds, then a brief pause when Trump hit the floor, followed by a more rapid burst of five shots.
49% : After the first bullet proceeded beyond Trump it could be observed, in a video published by the New York Times, creating a puff as it thudded into the bleachers close to rally-goer David Dutch.
49% : He said Butler Memorial Hospital had treated Trump for what it called a 'Gunshot Wound to the Right Ear.' He added: 'Based on my direct observations of the injury, my relevant clinical background, and my significant experience evaluating and treating patients with similar wounds, I completely concur with the initial assessment and treatment provided by the doctors and nurses at Butler Memorial Hospital on the day of the shooting.'
42% : It comes after FBI Director Christopher Wray told a congressional hearing on Wednesday there was 'some question about whether or not it's a bullet or shrapnel that hit his ear.' Two weeks after the attack Trump appeared without a bandage on his right ear for the first time on Friday, and his former doctor said he is 'rapidly recovering'.
37% : Another early theory was that a bullet could have hit one of the two glass teleprompter screens in front of Trump, with the former president then being hit by flying debris.
36% : The FBI still has questions over whether Trump was struck by shrapnel or by a bullet, but the former president has railed against that, saying he surely was hit by a bullet Donald Trump is seen on Friday July 26 without a bandage on is right ear for the first time since he survived an assassination attempt two weeks earlier Crooks, 20, used a PMS-brand AR rifle to shoot 5.56 ammunition in the assassination attempt.
35% : After the first three Crooks 're-aimed' and then started 'pulling the trigger as fast as he could.' Beck said he did not hear the sound of the first bullet hitting any other object before Trump grabbed his ear.
28% : In order for there to have been shrapnel, the FBI would need to discover that the bullet hit something 'hard' before reaching Trump, causing it to break up, ballistics expert Nathan Foster told Dailymail.com.
22% : That led to speculation the bullet could have hit an object, like a metal bar supporting the stage or bleachers, with a piece of shrapnel then flying off and hitting Trump.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.