FBI Clarifies Trump was Struck by 'Bullet' After Director Wray Said He Could Have Been Cut by 'Glass'
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-64% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-10% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
45% : The clarification came two days day after FBI Director Christopher Wray told Congress there was a possibility that Trump had been nicked in the ear by something other than a would-be killer's bullet. Fox News anchor Bret Baier shared the statement on his X (formerly Twitter) page Friday afternoon.45% : " Wray's comments prompted a response from Trump, who unleashed on the man he appointed to lead the FBI in a lengthy post from his Truth Social account.
44% : The FBI's Friday statement also elicited a response from Trump, who said he was owed an apology.
43% : Trump wrote.
16% : Trump wrote: "FBI Director Christopher Wray told Congress yesterday that he wasn't sure if I was hit by shrapnel, glass, or a bullet (the FBI never even checked!), but he was sure that Crooked Joe Biden was physically and cognitively "uneventful" - Wrong!
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.