FinMin ends Washington visit after key ADCB, IMF-World Bank talks
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
40% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-18% Somewhat Left
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
34% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
69% : Senator Aurangzeb highlighted Pakistan's ongoing reforms in taxation, energy, state-owned enterprises (SOEs), privatization, and public finance.58% : He referred to the World Bank-hosted event showcasing the transformation journey of Pakistan's Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) and agreed on the importance of enhancing the tax-to-GDP ratio and integrating data across government agencies.
39% : Read more: IMF projects Pakistan's growth at 3.6% Senator Muhammad Aurangzeb's participation in the IMF-World Bank Annual Meetings and his extensive engagements with global financial institutions reaffirm Pakistan's commitment to economic reform, fiscal responsibility, and international cooperation.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
