RedStateFrench Trader With 'No Political Agenda' Bets $30M on US Presidential Election -- Any Guesses?
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
36% Somewhat Right
- Politician Portrayal
2% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
8% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
56% : For that reason, and Théo's $30 million, I'll go with Trump for the win.54% : Its bettors were giving Trump a 60% chance of winning on Friday, while Harris's chances were 40%.
43% : As referenced in the above block quote, the Journal reported on October 18 that a "mystery $30 million wave of pro-Trump had moved the popular prediction market": Over the past two weeks, the chances of a Trump victory in the November election have surged on Polymarket, a crypto-based prediction market.
33% : " Théo also told the Journal what many of us suspect: "I know a lot of Americans who would vote for Trump without telling you that.
29% : Trump also shocked the betting markets.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
