From taxes to PIP: The five ways Labour MPs want Starmer to fight Reform
- Bias Rating
-12% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
60% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-12% Somewhat Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
18% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
49% : " In an interview with The Guardian, Haigh suggested it was "inevitable" that Reeves would have to rethink her approach to taxation to avoid further spending cuts, and urged Starmer to use the upcoming spending review to show that Labour was "listening to voters".43% : In a foreword for a report published by the Tony Blair Institute (TBI), the former Labour prime minister appeared to suggest that any strategy to reach net zero emissions by 2050 that limits fossil fuels in the short term or encourages people to limit consumption is "doomed to fail".
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.