Harvard's Battle With Trump Escalates as Research Money Is Suddenly Canceled
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
95% ReliableExcellent
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-61% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
19% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
51% : " Harvard's amended complaint, filed Tuesday, now includes the new grant terminations and names 10 federal agencies as defendants, including the Department of Energy, the National Science Foundation, and the Department of Defense.50% : Since then, federal grants to Harvard have been frozen, said Bryn Austin, who chairs the department of social and behavioral sciences in Harvard's T.H. Chan School of Public Health.
49% : The additional cuts don't bring any "wildly new" legal arguments to the table, said Neal Hutchens, a lawyer and professor of higher education at the University of Kentucky.
44% : But they do strengthen the university's arguments that grant cancellations will harm Harvard and its affiliates, and that the administration's actions defy due process, violate the First Amendment, and skew from legal standards under the Administrative Procedures Act, he said.
44% : " Within the School of Public Health, the climate "has already been one of anticipatory anxiety and fear" because of the school's equity-related work, said Ariel Beccia, an instructor whose NIH grant was terminated in March.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.