High Court to Take on Vidal's TRUMP TOO SMALL Trademark Petition
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
-58% Medium Left
- Politician Portrayal
-4% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
63% : Director Katherine Vidal that asks, "whether the refusal to register a mark under Section 1052(c) violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment when the mark contains criticism of a government official or public figure."59% : Specifically, the CAFC panel held that "applying section 2(c) to bar registration of [Steve] Elster's mark unconstitutionally restricts free speech in violation of the First Amendment."
59% : "In each case, this Court concluded that the restriction significantly burdened private speech and violated the First Amendment," Elster's brief explained.
52% : Vidal pointed to Brunetti and Tam as evidence of the Court's interest in addressing such issues, adding: "And this case presents a recurring issue under the First Amendment that this Court's decisions in Tam and Brunetti left open: 'whether a Lanham Act bar' on the registration of a trademark is 'a condition on a government benefit or a simple restriction on speech.'" Ultimately, the petition argues that it is the registration of a mark like Elster's that would chill speech, not the refusal of it.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.