"I Eat Ass" Bumper Sticker Might Be Obscene and Thus Constitutionally Unprotected

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

61% : As recognized by the Supreme Court, obscene expression that is not protected by the First Amendment "must be, in some significant way, erotic."
61% : If interpreted to refer to a sexual act, the Sticker is arguably obscene and unprotected by the First Amendment.
57% : ***" bumper sticker was not erotic in nature, and therefore could not be obscene expression falling outside the protection of the First Amendment. {
53% : Well, "The State Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial Circuit ultimately determined Webb had a valid defense to the charges under the First Amendment and, as such, dropped the charges against him."
43% : If the Sticker depicted a sexual act, it would be protected speech under the First Amendment only if it had serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.