If Trump rekindles bromance, Kim Jong Un has other suitors | Daniel DePetris

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

52% : During his first term, Trump was able to push for personal engagement with North Korea's head of state despite resistance among his national security advisers.
47% : Kim hasn't forgotten his previous meetings with Trump.
43% : This was partly because his other options -- more economic sanctions or military action -- ranged from ineffective to disastrous, and partly because the South Korean president at the time, Moon Jae-in, was able to convince Trump that a direct channel of communication to Kim might be the key to cementing a nuclear deal of historic importance.
39% : Yet if Trump wants a second roll of the dice, he needs a healthy dose of skepticism.
36% : In the end, Trump and Kim, their personal chemistry notwithstanding, were unable to come to terms -- Trump, pushed by his hawkish advisors, advocated for North Korea's complete denuclearization; Kim, meanwhile, was only willing to demobilize his main plutonium research facility at Yongbyon.
29% : As long as the Russia-North Korea relationship continues, Trump will be hard pressed to bring the North Koreans back to the negotiating table.
28% : Yet for Trump, all of these items may be minor when compared to resolving the North Korea nuclear conundrum.
26% : After nearly a year of fire-breathing rhetoric and talk about a "bloody nose" strike that would scare Pyongyang into talks, Trump opted to gamble on direct diplomacy.
26% : While Trump managed to get North Korea to suspend missile tests for a year -- no small accomplishment given its past activity -- the flashy summitry ultimately crashed and burned.
25% : None of this is to suggest that Trump shouldn't try another diplomatic foray with North Korea.
18% : If Trump enters office thinking he can easily resurrect his relationship with Kim, then he's going to be disappointed.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.