In Birthright Citizenship Case, Trump DOJ Asks Supreme Court Justices to Make Themselves Irrelevant | Washington Monthly

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

29% : But those precedents haven't stopped Trump from declaring all those cases were wrong -- and that he was overruling them by writ of Sharpie.
28% : At the very outset of oral argument in Trump v. CASA, the "birthright citizenship" case, Justice Sonia Sotomayor proposed a hypothetical aimed at scaring conservatives.
28% : When is it okay for one federal trial court judge to block a massive government program across the country -- such as Barack Obama's Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) immigration rule (blocked by a Texas trial judge), Donald Trump 45's "Travel ban" (blocked by a Washington trial judge), Joe Biden's student loan debt relief program (blocked by a Texas trial judge), or Donald Trump 47's orders to school districts to stop using or teaching diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies (blocked nationwide by four different trial judges).
27% : But in this case, Trump has set aside a federal statute, four Supreme Court cases, and over a century of executive interpretation to impose an invented rule that will cause chaos if put into effect.
24% : The second was: Has every Congress, every Court, and every administration for the past century and a half read the Fourteenth Amendment's Citizenship Clause wrong, leaving Donald Trump, on his sole authority, to upend the rule that all babies born in the U.S., except the children of diplomatic families, are citizens at birth?

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.