India Sidelines Stablecoins At Fintech Summit - FinanceFeeds
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-6% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
20% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
60% : The move reflects the government's desire to balance innovation with control, particularly amid concerns about the volatility and cross-border risks posed by privately issued stablecoins.56% : Speakers from the RBI and key fintech institutions presented the e-rupee pilot as a cornerstone of India's strategy to modernize financial systems while maintaining regulatory oversight.
53% : Without a stablecoin framework, companies aiming to explore blockchain-based settlement or tokenized assets continue to incorporate abroad, leading to capital and talent outflow.
40% : Some fintech executives at the summit suggested that India's first viable use case for stablecoins could be in international remittances, which account for over $100 billion annually.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
