
Influential group targets two overseer candidates in Harvard elections - The Boston Globe
- Bias Rating
-14% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
80% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
-16% Somewhat Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
-55% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
40% Positive
- Liberal
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
56% : As the case wound its way to the highest court in the land, where SFFA would resoundingly prevail, CDH tracked developments closely and urged supporters to "join us at rallies in DC to tell the Supreme Court they must defend diversity in higher education!"52% : CDH, which comprises "Harvard and Radcliffe alumni, students, staff and faculty fighting for diversity, equity, inclusion, and racial justice at the University and in higher education at large," was formed in 2016 to oppose an outsider ticket of overseer candidates who sought to scrutinize affirmative action in admissions and endorsed its own pro-affirmative action slate.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.