
Inside the Trump Plan for 2025
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
30% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-6% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
17% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
66% : In a conference room at Jones Day, Trump gave a brief speech and opened the floor to questions.63% : That August, after Trump became the Party's nominee, Heritage was enlisted to participate in the Presidential transition in the event of a Trump victory.
56% : Those in attendance knew that Trump would soon enter the race.
56% : Shortly after 6 P.M., Trump strode onto the patio, wearing his customary dark suit and a blue tie, and launched into a stem-winder.
53% : Its founder, Russell Vought, a former head of the Office of Management and Budget under Trump, and a leading candidate to be the White House chief of staff in a second term, was in attendance, chatting amiably with the guests.
52% : They were attending a private meeting with Trump, who was rapidly gaining in the Republican primary but remained anathema to much of the G.O.P. establishment.
52% : " As early as January, 2016, DeMint predicted that Trump would win the Republican nomination.
48% : All of them are expected to have high-ranking roles in the government if Trump is elected again.
46% : "People in the conservative movement suddenly realized that Trump could be the horse that they could ride to victory," a former senior Heritage staffer told me.
46% : Feulner later told the Times that Heritage saw a greater opportunity to influence policy under Trump than it had under Reagan.
46% : "No. 1, he did clearly want to make very significant changes," Feulner said of Trump.
45% : But DeMint, sensing an opportunity to maximize his clout with Trump, dismissed the concerns.
43% : In 2021, he wrote an op-ed for Newsweek that asked, "Is There Anything Actually Wrong with 'Christian Nationalism'?" The Center for Renewing America is one of roughly two dozen right-wing groups that have emerged in Washington since Trump left office.
38% : One of its groups, the American Accountability Foundation, has been investigating the personal profiles and social-media posts of federal employees to determine who might lack fealty to Trump.
36% : Trump replied, "Why don't I put out a list publicly of people who could be the sort of people I would put on the Supreme Court?"
24% : Ever since Trump was acquitted in his first impeachment trial, in 2020, he has threatened to purge the government of anyone he considered disloyal.
20% : Trump recounted a trip that he'd taken to Iraq as President, but he kept digressing to complain about a thirteen-billion-dollar aircraft carrier that he'd commissioned.
20% : "The key throughout the speech was that Trump complained about his personnel," the attendee said.
17% : " After the meeting with Trump, in 2016, some of DeMint's staff objected to the task of drawing up a list of potential judges, arguing that Heritage was overcommitting itself.
14% : Trump had not yet announced his reëlection bid, but inflation was high, Joe Biden was unpopular, and pollsters were anticipating a Republican rout in the upcoming midterms.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.