Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. Investors: Please contact the Portnoy Law Firm to recover your losses. April 14, 2025 Deadline to file Lead Plaintiff Motion - Intellia Therapeutics (NASDAQ:NTLA)
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
50% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-8% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Log In
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
17% Positive
- Liberal
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
54% : The Intellia class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) defendants created the false impression that they possessed reliable information pertaining to the viability of NTLA-3001's development and eventual marketing, if approved; (ii) Intellia's optimistic reports of timelines, including dosing and future studies of the drug, fell short of reality; the NTLA program was not viable or sustainable for Intellia because viral-based editing programs remained expensive and inefficient in comparison to then-existing non-viral delivery methods; (iii) Intellia was not equipped to timely dose patients with NTLA-3001, maintain the drug's research and development, or even to maintain its full staff in light of the existing scientific landscape surrounding viral-based editing drugs; and (iv) even if NTLA-3001 proved successful, the use of viral-based editing drugs is costly, inefficient, and poor mitigators of adverse effects in patients.*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.