
Iran Nuclear Talks Are Running Into Red Lines
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
45% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Right
- Politician Portrayal
-51% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-7% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
51% : But that weakness in itself makes it harder for Iran to surrender all vestiges of its nuclear program, a prestige program that has swallowed years of attention and vast amounts of government investment, Vaez said.39% : "Since Trump left office, Europe has moved to the right of the United States on Iran," Ben Taleblu said.
34% : "Trump can't afford to have that.
33% : That letter, and the congressional pressure, "allows Trump to benefit from a 'bad cop' in the Iranian nuclear talks," said Behnam Ben Taleblu, senior director of the Iran program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
25% : On May 14, more than 200 lawmakers in both chambers of Congress sent Trump a letter urging him against any deal that would allow Iran to retain uranium enrichment capability, which the lawmakers saw as the fatal flaw of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) that the Obama administration inked with Tehran in 2015.
23% : But a deal that allowed Iran to enrich small quantities of uranium to the low levels needed for civilian reactors while getting rid of its highly enriched uranium and opening the country to regular inspections by international nuclear authorities would look a lot like the Obama-era deal that Trump and other Republicans have spent a decade excoriating; Trump withdrew the United States from the JCPOA in 2018.
22% : Trump has previously warned Iran that if it does not make a deal, it could face a military strike with "violence like people haven't seen before.
16% : "If all that comes out is a JCPOA 2.0, the Iranians would say, 'We forced Trump to go back into the same deal,'" Ben Taleblu said.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.