Iran's long trail of deception fuels skepticism over new nuclear deal as talks continue - 1010 WCSI

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

57% : Traditionally, military pressure has influenced the Islamic Republic of Iran's recalcitrant and anti-American leaders to make concessions.
44% : He said those red lines meant Iran would never agree to dismantle its centrifuges for enriching uranium, halt enrichment altogether or reduce the amount of enriched uranium it stores to a level below the level it agreed in the 2015 deal that Trump abandoned. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP It would also not negotiate over its missile program, which Tehran views as outside the scope of any nuclear deal.
38% : As we continue to talk, we expect to refine a framework and timetable for working towards a deal that achieves the president's objectives peacefully." Speaking Friday, President Trump told reporters, "I'm for stopping Iran very simply from having a nuclear weapon.
31% : Trump said in late March he would launch military strikes against Iran if it failed to agree to his demands for a new nuclear pact.
23% : " Mark Wallace, the CEO of United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) and a former U.N. ambassador to the United Nations under President George W. Bush, told Fox News Digital, "Under the Bush administration, zero enrichment was enshrined in U.N. Security Council resolutions.
21% : After all, in 2018, Trump pulled out of that very deal.
19% : " The Obama administration's concession to Iran to permit it to enrich uranium to 3.67% has created new problems for Trump to halt Tehran's drive to build a weapon.
8% : " In 2018, President Trump withdrew from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the formal name for the 2015 nuclear deal brokered by the Obama administration, because, he argued, it failed to stop Iran's ambitions to construct an atomic bomb.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.