Is Britain breaking international law over Israel to avoid offending Trump? We may find out in court this week | Yasmine Ahmed

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

63% : He has encouraged Israel to break the ceasefire, reversed a halt on the supply to Israel of the devastating 2,000lb bombs, lifted sanctions on violent actors in the West Bank, and threatens foreign nationals who criticise Israel in the US with deportation.
39% : Trump has supported the ethnic cleansing and forced displacement of Palestinians in Gaza, supported the campaign to liquidate the UN relief works agency for Palestine refugees in the near east (Unrwa), the main UN aid agency for Palestinian refugees.
31% : In the context of current hostilities in Gaza, Trump has further entrenched and hardened Joe Biden's approach, deepening US complicity in Israeli atrocities.
29% : Trump has aggressively attacked vital organs of justice and order such as the international criminal court (ICC) and the UN, often in defence of Israel, including by authorising a sanctions programme that targets the critical work of the ICC, withdrawing the US from the UN's human rights council, and proposing to slash funding to the numerous UN programmes and institutions.
19% : At a time of incredible uncertainty and geopolitical upheaval, Britain needs to stand up for and be committed to international law - even if it upsets Donald Trump.
11% : This is dangerous in any context but with Donald Trump at the helm in the White House, it borders on the grotesquely absurd.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.