
Jimmy Carter's Legacy on Election Integrity That Would Prompt Democrats to Label Him Jim Crow 2.0 Today
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
55% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
12% Somewhat Right
- Politician Portrayal
-42% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-4% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
61% : " Many of the non-controversial suggestions supported by the former Democratic president in 2005 would be fiercely opposed and outright smeared by his own party years later.58% : One could certainly be that as president, Carter didn't champion election integrity laws-but reforms such as voter ID are nevertheless a lasting part of his legacy.
57% : These included restrictions on ballot harvesting and extending voter ID to mail-in voting.
47% : " Democrats such as former Georgia lawmaker Stacey Abrams, then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and Biden who had become president, called the laws "Jim Crow 2.0."
46% : The report called for adopting national voter ID, clearing the names of dead people from voter registration lists, restricting ballot harvesting, and for allowing election observers at polling sites.
39% : The report continued: "The electoral system cannot inspire public confidence if no safeguards exist to deter or detect fraud or to confirm the identity of voters.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.