Fox NewsJONATHAN TURLEY: The critical explanation missing from Jack Smith's Trump report
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
60% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
72% Very Right
- Politician Portrayal
8% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
21% Positive
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
50% : That is why he filed the second case in D.C., where he was given the best possible judge for the prosecution, a judge viewed by many as predisposed against Trump. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP In a sentencing hearing of a Jan. 6 rioter in 2022, Chutkan had said that the rioters "were there in fealty, in loyalty, to one man -- not to the Constitution."25% : He may be right about obtaining a conviction before a Washington, D.C. jury and a highly motivated judge against Trump.
22% : What the report did not contain is an explanation of how Smith destroyed his own cases against Trump.
21% : However, he would not have been able to sustain any conviction -- and this report makes that abundantly clear. Smith repeats the same conclusory evidence, such as citing how Donald Trump said "fight" ten times in his January 6, 2021, speech.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
