Judge eviscerates 'unlawful' Biden transgender edict on employers * WorldNetDaily * by Tyler O'Neil, The Daily Signal

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

64% : Rather, it cited Bostock v. Clayton County (2020), in which the Supreme Court ruled that firing a person over his or her sexual orientation or gender identity would violate Title VII.
53% : While President Trump issued an executive order directing the EEOC to immediately rescind the guidance, then-Commissioners Charlotte Burrows and Jocelyn Samuels, joined by current Commissioner and Kalpana Kotagal, issued a statement standing by the document.
46% : " Title VII protects employees from discrimination at state and federal governments and at companies employing 15 or more people.
46% : " When the Supreme Court ruled in 1976 that "pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions" did not fall under the category of discrimination on the basis of "sex" in Title VII, Congress responded by passing the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978.
27% : Trump removed Burrows and Samuels from office, and until they are replaced, EEOC lacks a quorum to rescind the guidance.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.