Judge Kaplan lets Alina Habba change the rules during trial
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
45% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-64% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-18% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
33% : Carroll is seeking $10 million from Trump in compensatory damages over his denial of her sexual assault claims.30% : " The trial unfolding in Manhattan is deciding how much Trump will have to pay Carroll for defaming her.
26% : A civil jury already found Trump liable for sexually abusing Carroll in the dressing room of a department store in the mid-1990s and for defaming her for saying she fabricated the story.
26% : " In the first defamation trial, Martin recalled Carroll telling her about the sexual assault soon after it happened and that she had told Carroll not to go public "because it was Donald Trump and he had a lot of attorneys, and I thought he would bury her.
24% : " Martin testified that she had been to approximately six of the parties that Carroll hosted in relation to her lawsuits against Trump.
19% : Trump has continued to deny any wrongdoing.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.