JUST IN: Jack Smith Report Insists Evidence Against Trump 'Sufficient' for Conviction If Not for 2024 Victory

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

33% : "When it became clear that Trump had lost the election and that lawful means of challenging the election results had failed, he resorted to a series of criminal efforts to retain power," Smith wrote. Smith, appointed to investigate Trump's efforts to subvert democracy after the January 6 Capitol riot of 2021, concluded that "but for Mr. Trump's election and imminent return to the presidency, the office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial.
24% : The report reveals that prosecutors considered invoking the Insurrection Act but ultimately declined due to insufficient evidence of Trump's intent regarding the January 6 violence.
20% : While Trump was impeached and later indicted on four counts, including conspiracy to defraud the U.S., he pleaded not guilty to all charges.
19% : Trump responded to the report on Truth Social, labeling Smith a "lamebrain prosecutor" and framing the investigation as a political attack.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.