Ken Griffin: America's dominant financial brand now 'at risk' in Trump era
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
60% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
6% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-43% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
16% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
70% : " President Trump, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick "need to be very thoughtful" about protecting those brand advantages, Griffin said during the wide-ranging conversation.44% : This month, the price of 10-year Treasurys plunged along with stocks after Trump unveiled an aggressive set of "reciprocal" tariffs on countries around the world.
42% : Trump later paused many of them for 90 days while negotiations take place, but he left 145% duties in place on Chinese goods.
36% : Last December, Griffin said he voted for Trump but didn't contribute money to his campaign, having already backed some GOP rivals.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
