Less than 3% of farmland devoted to rice production -- IFS
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
35% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-12% Somewhat Left
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
2% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
61% : Thailand followed a similar path, prioritising rice cultivation within its agricultural strategy and maintaining consistent state support.56% : As a result, only three percent of rice farmers currently use certified seed, compared to more than 80 percent in Vietnam, where a mix of public and private enterprises ensures quality and availability.
56% : On seed systems, the RDB should collaborate with research institutions to produce, certify, and distribute high-yielding seed varieties, including aromatic rice types comparable to imported brands.
52% : Young people, it argues, should be supported with seed capital, training, and mechanisation services irrespective of political affiliation, enabling them to participate in group-based or cooperative farming ventures.
50% : The two countries, the report noted, achieved this through policy coherence, government coordination, and sustained public investment in inputs, irrigation, and market infrastructure.
49% : Despite repeated government interventions, including the Operation Feed Yourself campaign to the Planting for Food and Jobs initiative and the National Rice Development Strategies (NRDS I and II), the sector continues to underperform, largely due to poor strategy, weak implementation and policy discontinuity.
47% : The dismantling of the Ghana Seed Company left private firms to drive supply, but without state coordination, the sector stagnated.
46% : In contrast, Thailand dedicates between 43.1 and 51.5 percent of its farmland to rice, while Vietnam allocates 58.8 to 92 percent, a commitment that has allowed both nations to attain self-sufficiency and become major exporters.
46% : Dr. Boakye stressed that Ghana's rice sector must move beyond short-term programmes and "political showmanship" to embrace sustained, non-partisan institutional reforms.
43% : Private investment must complement, not replace, government coordination," Dr. Boakye said.
42% : The IFS recommended that the RDB actively engage in local fertiliser production, offering tax incentives and subsidies to private investors.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.