
Letters to the editor: 'King Charles III would stand up for Canada in no uncertain terms ... however obliquely he might express it.' Letters to the editor for May 18
- Bias Rating
-26% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
45% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-50% Medium Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
61% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
27% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
79% : The gesture would surely be effective as Donald Trump trips over himself with delight at all things royal, and it did look like Mr. Starmer subsequently had Mr. Trump eating out of his hand.77% : Re "Carney criticizes Starmer's invitation to Trump for a second state visit" (May 15): During the Oval Office meeting with Keir Starmer, bearing an invitation from King Charles III to the U.S. President for a state visit, my reaction was that this was indeed a shrewd move on the part of Mr. Starmer.
52% : Re "Trans Mountain CEO Mark Maki sees new pipelines on the horizon" (Report on Business, May 13): Much of the debate around energy infrastructure in Canada focuses on pipelines and politics.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.