'Love solving wars': Did Donald Trump really call Pakistan-Afghanistan conflict easy to solve?
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
25% ReliableLimited
- Policy Leaning
-52% Medium Left
- Politician Portrayal
-58% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-25% Negative
- Liberal
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
50% : Speaking to reporters on Friday, Trump discussed the ongoing violence between Afghanistan and Pakistan and claimed that it would be "easy" for him to solve.50% : "Although I do understand that Pakistan attacked, or there is an attack going on with Afghanistan," Trump remarked, referring to how he "solved" the India-Pak issue back in May before launching into the current border fight in Afghanistan.
50% : Despite "solving so many wars," Trump also bemoaned the fact that he never received a Nobel Prize.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
