NatureMacrovascular and microvascular outcomes of metabolic surgery versus GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with diabetes and obesity - Nature Medicine
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-4% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
9% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
57% : Throughout the study, the proportion of patients with active prescriptions for diabetes (including sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors), blood pressure (BP) (including RAAS inhibitors) and cholesterol control was significantly higher in the nonsurgical group compared to the surgical group (Fig. 4, Extended Data Fig. 2 and Extended Data Table 5).50% : Black, 121 (3.1%) other races; mean age, 54.2 years (s.d. 11.0); mean body mass index (BMI), 41.8 kg m (s.d. 8.6)) with obesity and T2DM who received care at the Cleveland Clinic Health System (CCHS) in the United States from 2010 to 2017 were studied (Extended Data Fig. 1).
45% : In the doubly robust analysis, the adjusted absolute risk difference was 12.6% (95% CI 8.1-16.7%); adjusted HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.43-0.67); P < 0.001 (Fig. 1c and Table 2).
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
