
Mainers' taxes could go up if municipal bonds lose tax exemptions
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
40% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
12% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
10% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
55% : "Eliminating the tax exemption for these investments will lead to further widening of the existing underfunded 'infrastructure gap,' particularly in rural areas less able to seek alternative funding sources.54% : In Portland, city staff is aware of the discussions about the tax exemption, but does not see it as a short-term concern, according to spokesperson Jessica Grondin.
51% : We will be working with the Maine Municipal Association, the National League of Cities and our federal delegation to ensure the tax-exempt status of municipal bonds, which is critical to our investment in municipal infrastructure, is maintained," she said in a statement.
50% : " Nearly $400 billion in municipal bonds were issued across the country in 2023, and by 2031, those bonds are expected to finance another $3 trillion in critical infrastructure, according to the National League of Cities, which is advocating against eliminating or reducing the exemption.
50% : Poore said the town's bond agent estimates that the elimination of the tax-exempt status would cause rates to increase around 33%, which would increase repayment costs for the projects by $3.9 million. Tracy Roy, Lewiston's finance director, wrote to Sen. Angus King, I-Maine, asking him to advocate for the continuation of the tax exemption.
49% : "Cities and towns rely on municipal bonds to build schools and hospitals, maintain roads, and fund other critical infrastructure projects," she said in a statement.
48% : Towns and cities have long depended on tax-exempt bonds to fund projects of all kinds, from road and sewer repairs to new schools and public safety buildings.
48% : Without the tax exemption, that project would increase by as much as $16.3 million.
47% : Dufour said that the status of the tax exemption has come up several times over the past six months.
46% : Last year, the Maine Municipal Bond Bank financed several tax-exempt projects totaling nearly $9 million in improvements.
45% : A memo leaked from the House Ways and Means Committee includes the federal tax exemption for state and local bonds in a list of programs that could be modified or eliminated to reduce federal spending.
44% : The city will be issuing just over $20 million in tax-exempt bonds this month.
44% : A spokesperson for King said the senator wants the tax exemption kept in place.
28% : Rep. Chellie Pingree, D-1st District, said repealing the exemption "is just another example of how Republicans will go to any length to pass tax cuts for billionaires and big corporations -- and why making people like Donald Trump and Elon Musk even richer is more important to them than investing in our communities.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.