Matt Gaetz Blasts Secretary of Defense Austin Over Defense's Horrible Record on Strategy and Everything Else

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

67% : The context wasn't let's better understand socialism so we can defeat it.
60% : So, now that you know that they did this, would you agree that embracing socialism is not an effective strategy to combat China?
60% : So, now that you know that they did this, would you agree that embracing socialism is not an effective strategy to combat China?
59% : And the reason I know that's the context is because the lecture was pulled from a book written by Thomas Piketty entitled "Time for Socialism."
50% : Not if we embrace socialism.
49% : Gaetz: Secretary Austin, why should American taxpayers fund lectures at the National Defense University that promote socialism as a strategy to combat China?
49% : Gaetz: Secretary Austin, why should American taxpayers fund lectures at the National Defense University that promote socialism as a strategy to combat China?
49% : The National Defense University had Thomas Piketty come and this was the title of his lecture "Responding to China: The Cae for Global Justice and Democratic Socialism.
48% : The National Defense University had Thomas Piketty come and this was the title of his lecture "Responding to China: The Case for Global Justice and Democratic Socialism."
47% : Austin: I certainly don't agree with embracing socialism.
47% : Austin: I certainly don't agree with embracing socialism.
43% : The concept was that it's time for socialism.
42% : Everyone else in the world seem to be developing more capabilities and being more strategic; we've got time to embrace Critical Race Theory at West Point, to embrace socialism at the National Defense University, to do mandatory pronoun training.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.