Morning Glory: What is Harvard arguing?

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

58% : Like the editors at the Journal, some guests on my program fear a future leftist president using the law to deny disfavored conservative institutions their tax-exempt status.
53% : " "The IRS in 1970 adopted a policy of barring tax-exempt status for private schools engaging in racial discrimination."
53% : It is not for elites to pick and choose which Supreme Court precedents apply to which tax-exempt institutions.
52% : They range from "Governance and leadership reform" to "Merit-Based Admission Reform" to "Reforming Programs with Egregious Records of Anti-Semitism or Other Bias" to "Discontinuation of DEI."
51% : (The University regained tax-exempt status in 2017.)
50% : the Journal noted in a Wednesday editorial titled "Should Harvard Be Tax Exempt?" "In 1983 the Supreme Court upheld the IRS's rescission of Bob Jones University's tax-exempt status on the rationale that "'an institution seeking tax-exempt status must serve a public purpose and not be contrary to established public policy.'
47% : TRUMP SAYS HARVARD 'LOST ITS WAY,' DOESN'T DESERVE FEDERAL FUNDING When Justice Lewis Powell opened the door -- very, very slightly -- to the use of race in admissions in only higher education in 1978's Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, almost all of American higher ed (and not a few K-12 school districts) promptly rushed through that door, out of it, and over the top of a cliff and fell, fell, fell and are falling still into prohibited uses of race on campus.
24% : The difference is: Harvard has lots and lots of money and even more alums who hate Trump more than they hate prohibited discrimination.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.