Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder Article RatingNNPA condemns NABJ's decision to include Trump in annual panel | Minnesota Spokesman-Recorder
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
40% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
90% Very Right
- Politician Portrayal
-46% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-5% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
52% : "To the journalists interviewing Trump, I wish them the best of luck.42% : Attiah noted that NABJ leadership did not consult her in the decision to provide Trump with a platform.
29% : It is a tragic affront to Black America for NABJ to permit Trump to spew racist lies, hatred, and fascism at an NABJ national convention.
26% : " Roland Martin, another prominent NABJ member, added that he found it troubling that no Black male journalists were invited to question Trump.
25% : Folks shouldn't assume that all the journalists interviewing Trump at NABJ aren't going to ask real questions or hold him accountable.
18% : " Prominent journalists April Ryan and Yamiche Alcindor, both of whom Trump has previously targeted, also condemned the NABJ's decision.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
