Mediaite'Not a Good Look': Erick Erickson Blasts Trump Transition Team Blocking Anti-Abortion HHS Deputy Pick As 'Too Controversial'
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
45% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-2% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-44% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-1% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
51% : Erickson shared the reporting and commented, "Trump is putting a pro-abortion activist in charge of HHS and his team is blocking a great pro-life champion from a position in HHS.49% : Politico reported this week that anti-abortion activist Roger Severino - a Project 2025 co-author - had been floated for a senior role inside Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s HHS but that the first Trump term alum was blocked by his team amid concerns he might alienate moderates.
30% : Some of them worried Severino's nomination would further inflame fears among voters and moderate Republican lawmakers that Trump might widely restrict abortion access, distracting from the rest of the president-elect's agenda, though they added that Trump officials remain open to appointing other anti-abortion officials at HHS.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
