
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman testifies in 'historic' Senate hearing on AI safety
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
50% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-8% Center
- Politician Portrayal
14% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
58% : The Senate judiciary subcommittee session represented Altman's first official appearance before Congress, giving senators the opportunity to question the OpenAI CEO concerning his company's views on regulation.55% : This included support for privacy protections, greater government oversight, third-party auditing, and how soon the U.S. government should seek to regulate the industry (immediately).
48% : Gary Marcus, a signatory of the pause letter, admitted he agreed more to the spirit of the letter than its contents, but urged Congress to consider global oversight as well as federal regulation -- a sentiment Altman agreed with.
37% : Dubbed a "historic" session by Illinois Senator Dick Durbin, the proceedings focused on understanding the potential threats posed by generative AI models such as ChatGPT and how lawmakers should approach regulation.
37% : Her statements indicate that IBM is in favor of a surgical approach to regulation using currently existing regulatory bodies to focus enforcement on specific use cases.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.