
Politics: The Minders and Mandarins of Capitalism
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-76% Very Left
- Politician Portrayal
-18% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
57% : Industrial policy: tariffs and other protections, subsidies to viable industries and firms, "investments" in R&D and higher education, and so on.49% : The way to diminish poverty and aid the disadvantaged is therefore not to punish positive-sum exchanges by taxation, but to allow more of them.
49% : "Capitalism must reward innovation," they write, "but it must be regulated to prevent innovation rents" -- rents meaning profits accruing to incumbent firms -- "from stifling competition and thus jeopardizing future innovation."
48% : Mr. Aghion, Ms. Antonin and Mr. Bunel share Schumpeter's overdefined understanding of capitalism.
45% : And what sort of regulations do they think will encourage innovation, foster competition and save capitalism from itself?
45% : What capitalism needs, if I may put their argument in my own words, is more public officials ready to heed the advice of centrist academic economists.
40% : Growth diminishes; a dissatisfied public demands welfare-state protections and restrictions on entrepreneurial activity; and capitalism, deprived of growth, slowly transmutes into socialism.
39% : But capitalism, in their view, is constantly menacing itself and requires the aid of sage policy makers to prevent its collapse.
38% : Clearly some parts of that analysis are valid, although Schumpeter was mistaken, in my view, to think of capitalism as a "structure" that can't adapt to the demands placed on it by an intermittently irrational public.
37% : In "Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy" (1942), Schumpeter contended that capitalism was doomed by its own logic.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.