Daily Mail Online Article RatingPush for new DEATH tax in Australia from boomer
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
10% ReliableLimited
- Policy Leaning
64% Medium Right
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-2% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
57% : Whether a modern inheritance tax should be part of the fix to help fund income tax cuts, as he's calling for, is the harder question to answer.56% : But which federal government will go through the pain of introducing such a tax only to hand the proceeds to the states?
55% : It would remove interstate tax shopping and help mend the imbalance between federal and state finances.
50% : Do we really trust government to only introduce inheritance taxes if they reduce income taxes?
50% : Immediate offsets to income tax in the same Budget year (for example, higher tax-free thresholds or lower marginal rates) so the trade-off is real, not theoretical.
49% : Without reform, those inheritances will mostly go to smaller cohorts of already financially secure children, deepening the inequality divide in this country.
48% : His son, a full-time worker earning about $56,000 a year, paid roughly 17 per cent in tax in 2022-23.
48% : The right one now is a pact, not a brawl: bring back a national inheritance tax that is fair, simple, and hard to avoid; use the proceeds to cut taxes that bite on work; and further tighten the most generous super concessions, using some of the new revenue on housing-enabling infrastructure.
47% : If housing affordability is the end goal, inheritance tax reform must happen alongside more supply where people actually want to live, fewer demand-side subsidies that inflate prices (like Albo's new deposit guarantee), and an honest look at how housing is privileged in the tax code, including the tax-free family home and negative gearing.
46% : But Roach and his wife, who are both retired, paid far less despite having a combined annual income of around $200,000 and assets worth more than $5 million. Their effective tax rates were just 11 per cent and 5 per cent respectively, thanks to tax-free superannuation income and other concessionally taxed investments.
45% : One way to bring in inheritance taxes would be to couple doing so with indexing income taxes, to ensure bracket creep doesn't drive them up year in, year out.
42% : People usually vote their self-interest.
38% : While people might bristle at having their wealth taxed after they die, it's better to pay taxes when you are dead rather than when you're alive.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
