
Queensland to run its coal plants up to a decade longer than previously planned
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
55% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
4% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
14% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
58% : About 65% of the state's electricity in the past year came from coal, followed by solar (20%) and wind (6%).54% : The Queensland treasurer and energy minister, David Janetzki, revealed an "energy roadmap" on Friday and said some state-owned coal assets would run until at least 2046, "meaning coal will be part of the state's generation mix for decades".
54% : "Despite the decision to remove renewable energy targets, the roadmap relies upon up to 6.8 gigawatts of new wind and solar and 3.8GW of storage by 2030," she said.
51% : Nicole Forrester, of WWF-Australia, said the government had released a roadmap "to more fires, floods and heatwaves, and more mass bleaching events for the Great Barrier Reef". "Keeping coal and delaying climate action will also mean more hip pocket pain for Queenslanders as extreme weather becomes more frequent and intense."
43% : The minister confirmed the government had no plans to repeal the state's legislated target to cut emissions by 75% by 2035, but did not explain how running coal for longer would affect those efforts.
43% : "Extending coal, which is already unreliable and expensive, means more outages, higher bills and less investment in cheap renewable alternatives, like wind and solar backed by batteries.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.