Understand the bias, discover the truth in your news. Get Started

Red States Adopt DOGE as Cost-Saving Measure, Endorsed by Governors - Internewscast Journal

  • Bias Rating
  • Reliability

    25% ReliableLimited

  • Policy Leaning

    N/A

  • Politician Portrayal

    18% Positive

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

21% Positive

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

60% : In Oklahoma, Gov. Kevin Stitt -- who says in a blurb on the Oklahoma DOGE website that "I've been DOGE-ing in Oklahoma since before it was cool" -- made a DOGE splash with the first report by his Division of Government Efficiency by declaring that the state would refuse some $157 million in federal public health grants.
55% : During the tumultuous early days of President Donald Trump's leadership, his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), once directed by the billionaire Elon Musk, inspired similar efforts at the state level.
51% : Steve Slivinski, a senior fellow at the libertarian Cato Institute who researches state government regulatory structures, said that a lot of what he has seen from state-level DOGE initiatives are the "same stuff you do on a pretty regular basis anyway" in state governments.
50% : Analysts at the pro-labor Economic Policy Institute say that governors and lawmakers, primarily in the South and Midwest, are using DOGE to breathe new life into long-term agendas to consolidate power away from state agencies and civil servants, dismantle public services and benefit insiders and privatization advocates.
46% : States typically have routine auditing procedures and the ways states have of saving money are "relatively unsexy," Slivinski said.
44% : Critics argue that some of these state-level initiatives are not particularly innovative and can be wasteful, as they often duplicate existing processes typically handled by legislative committees or independent state auditors.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link