
Rocklin voters want new representation: Vote Neva Parker, not Rep. Joe Patterson
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
45% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-34% Somewhat Left
- Politician Portrayal
2% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
32% Positive
- Liberal
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
58% : That's where Prop. 35 comes in" (sacbee.com, Oct. 15) In California, marketing your proposition as a solution to the health care crisis and a promise to reduce existing inequities in health care is a very appealing message; and with healthcare funding continuing to increase in complexity, it is easy to approve a message sponsored by Planned Parenthood and other big names in healthcare.58% : His opponent, Neva Parker, is endorsed by the Sierra Club, Planned Parenthood, the California Labor Federation and Dolores Huerta. Patterson, by comparison, has a 0% rating with the Sierra Club, a 0% rating with Planned Parenthood and a mediocre rating with the California Labor Federation.
51% : Prop. 35 would prevent communities from receiving funding for diverse health care needs and would limit elected officials from protecting their constituents.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.