
S&P issues Chicago Board of Education a warning: Find revenue or 'scale down' operations to fund CTU contract
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
55% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-6% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-3% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
7% Positive
- Liberal
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
50% : Global credit ratings firm S&P rang the alarm on Chicago Public School finances last week, weighing in on the ongoing political gridlock between district leadership, the Chicago Teachers Union and Mayor Brandon Johnson with a warning: How the Board of Education opts to fund the CTU's forthcoming contract will determine the financial health of the district for years to come.50% : It's far better for that to occur sooner, through compromise, than later through layoffs or state intervention, she said.
47% : As for how the contract will be funded, Sitkowski said in November that CPS is awaiting tax increment financing, or TIF, surplus funds from the city.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.