BreitbartSpeaker Mike Johnson: Nancy Pelosi Retirement an 'Important Sign' Party Not Radical Enough for the Marxists
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
45% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
48% Medium Right
- Politician Portrayal
5% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
29% Positive
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
42% : "If you run as a socialist, you run on a on a big list of false claims.41% : Even the famous San Francisco liberal is not far-left enough for the neo-Marxist," the Speaker observed, highlighting a clash within the Democrat Party, as moderates are losing ground to the party members embracing socialism.
23% : Johnson pointed to the election of socialist Muslim Zohran Mamdani in New York City, noting that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) "had to bend the knee to the socialist." "Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer are both from New York, the top Democrat leader in the House and the top leader in the Senate.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
