GOBankingRates Article RatingStates Where $1 Million in Retirement Won't Last Long
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
20% ReliableLimited
- Policy Leaning
8% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
34% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
61% : I asked ChatGPT to tell me at a glance where $1 million in retirement savings will run out the fastest if someone retired today and also took Social Security benefits.59% : Retirees are encouraged to have somewhere in the ballpark of $1 million in retirement funds by the time they retire, with the expectation that those funds, plus Social Security, will be enough to get you through your golden years.
56% : Depending on the age of retirement, you might be able to swing a full retirement in the Garden State, where, coupled with Social Security, $1 million can last about 24.2 years, the AI told me.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
