State supreme court judicial elections assume new importance after Dobbs ruling

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

49% : The judicial races will likely take on new prominence this election cycle after a Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization that struck down the high court's nearly 50-year-old ruling in Roe v. Wade sent the legality of abortion back to the states to legislate.
41% : CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER Democrats disappointed by the outcome in Dobbs are urging a new focus on down-ballot races, especially because congressional action on abortion, either to restrict or expand access, appears unlikely for the foreseeable future.
34% : A pre-Roe 1931 statutory ban on abortion remains the subject of litigation, in which abortion supporters are attempting to block enforcement of the law now in the absence of Roe.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.