New York Post Article RatingSupreme Court agonizes over whether lower courts can block Trump...
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
60% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
44% Medium Right
- Politician Portrayal
-15% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-25% Negative
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
47% : " Jeremy Feigenbaum, representing the states as New Jersey Solicitor General, acknowledged the need to rein in the lower courts and laid out a three-pronged test to determine whether universal injunctions are appropriate: whether alternative remedies are practical and whether congressional authorization and alternative forms of non-party relief are available.39% : " The consolidated case of Trump v. CASA, Trump v. Washington and Trump v. New Jersey is expected to be decided by the end of June.
5% : " In March, a tally by the Harvard Law Review found that lower courts lodged at least 64 national injunctions against Trump during his tenure, compared to just six lodged against former President George W. Bush, 12 against former President Barack Obama and 14 against former President Joe Biden during their entire presidencies.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
