
Syrian rebel leader calls for lifting of sanctions, as Assad defends exit - The Boston Globe
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
30% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-16% Somewhat Left
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-2% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
62% : Sharaa appears to be making rapid progress toward international recognition, with a parade of officials from the United Nations, Europe, and the Middle East descending on Damascus to meet with him or reopen embassies.45% : The rebel leader called for sanctions placed on the Assad regime to be lifted, emphasizing that they had been imposed on "the executioner" -- meaning Assad, who was now gone -- and that Syria needed to prioritize building a state and creating public institutions that served all residents. Assad, the man Sharaa deposed, defended his record during the country's brutal civil war in his statement on social media.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.