The Legal and political issues in the Supreme Court hearing on Trump's attack on birthright citizenship

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

49% : The case arises from an executive order signed by Trump on his first day back in office which seeks to end birthright citizenship in open defiance of the Fourteenth Amendment.
49% : More fundamentally, the administration is seeking the effective elimination of judicial oversight over executive power.
39% : His social agenda of mass deportations, state violence, censorship, war and the destruction of social programs requires the destruction of democratic rights and the consolidation of all power in the executive.
36% : Sauer's position before the Supreme Court, only translated into legal mumbo jumbo what Trump declared in February: He who saves his country does not violate any laws.
30% : Trump v. CASA is not just about immigrant rights or the Fourteenth Amendment.
28% : Challenges, moreover, would be confined to those with the financial means to hire expensive federal litigators or the wherewithal to seek out pro bono representation from law firms that have not capitulated to Trump.
22% : Trump, who represents the most grotesque and rapacious layers of the financial oligarchy, is constructing a regime of permanent, unaccountable executive rule.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.