
The loss of editorial freedom at 60 Minutes is a sorry milestone for US media | Margaret Sullivan
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
50% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-38% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
25% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
48% : What has happened with 60 Minutes is a high-octane version of what's happening everywhere in Trump 2.0 There have been so many red alerts for press freedom in the United States over the past few months that it can be hard to know which ones really matter.45% : Just think of what happened with Jeff Bezos, who has put at risk the editorial independence of the Washington Post, which he owns, in order to please Trump and protect the fortunes of his companies, including Amazon.
41% : If the rich and powerful won't stand up to Trump, what hope can there be for the disenfranchised and powerless?
37% : Trump sued 60 Minutes for $20bn a few months ago, claiming unfair and deceptive editing of an interview with his then rival for the presidency, Kamala Harris.
29% : What has happened with 60 Minutes is a high-octane version of what is happening everywhere in Trump 2.0. Those who could stand up to Trump's bullying are instead doing what scholars of authoritarianism say must be avoided, if democracy is to be salvaged.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.