The Economist Article RatingThe new players who could run Gaza
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
30% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-8% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-1% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-28% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
60% : Some in Israel, too, might see benefits in seeing their enemy retain control of Gaza, as they did after 2007.56% : Hamas seized control in the end, tossing their rivals from rooftops.
53% : And yet no sooner had a ceasefire been declared than the battle for control of post-war Gaza began.
51% : In 2007 Gaza had cities, universities and hotels.
43% : With fewer high-rises in Gaza today, its preferred deterrence is summarily executing rivals in public.
40% : Despite ostensibly agreeing to cede control, Hamas is, again, now the strongest contender.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
