The New Tax Plan Is Complicated, Unfair and Unaffordable
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
55% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-1% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
6% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
57% : And for millions of families, those tax savings would be dwarfed by the cost of losing their Medicaid as a result of the cuts in the bill.55% : The latest effort, which I can think of only as tax deform, is a tremendously expensive effort to make the tax code less efficient, less fair and more complicated.
52% : Of all the changes that he requested in the name of making the tax code more fair, the only one that made it into the bill was a reduction in tax breaks for sports owners, for a saving of about $100 million per year -- a pittance compared with the tens of billions a year in new and expanded tax breaks for business owners, wealthy estates and high-income households.
50% : The Constitution assigns the House of Representatives the role of originating tax changes.
48% : The House bill is estimated by Congress's nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation to lower tax revenue by $3.8 trillion over 10 years, but even that eye-popping figure understates its likely cost.
44% : Based on estimates by the Joint Committee on Taxation, in 2027 they would pay a staggering $96 billion less in taxes.
39% : There was much to dislike in the package of large and regressive tax cuts advanced by President Trump in his first term, but I'll give it this:
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.